I'm honestly still new to the whole Twitter thing in general, but I'm trying out a few things.
1) If Lara trusted the Coalition, she’d work for them as a pilot flying the void between the worlds. She’d know what to think when they tell her a captain went rogue + killed the other pilots. But if Lara doesn’t fight with them, the captain might end the worlds.
2) Lara pilots her airship through the void between the worlds, scavenges in ancient ruins for lost artifacts, and always sticks her neck out for her tight-knit crew. Now she has to chase a military renegade through the void to prevent society’s destruction.
3) Lara Kavarin flies her ship through the void between the worlds, seeking lost treasures. Amerlaine Silver wants to unleash the horrors of the void to destroy society. Outmatched, Lara must stop her, or else the worlds will become a living nightmare.
Thanks for the feedback. I think one of the draws of my book is the setting. The void between the worlds is trippy, and functions in many ways like space travel, but the tech of the story is more based around the early 1900s (magic worlds-traversing ships aside). This book really falls right on the science fantasy line. There was one pitch I had come up with that was a bit more explicit on that count:
Steampunk meets space opera when the captain of a worlds-traversing airship must battle a military renegade in possession of a device that can destroy society.
I know that's definitely more vague about some other parts, but is this an angle you think is worth pursuing? I'll try to futz around with what I have and come back with a couple of others.